4/8/2010 – The Heaven/Hell Debate

The Philodemic held its final debate of the 2010 Merrick Season last night, with great success. Affirming “Resolved: It is better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven,” Mr. Scott Olmsted articulated a belief that it takes courage to be in Hell, and that reigning liberates the soul. Countering on the Negation, Mr. Tyler Hale painted Hell as “perverse Calvinism,” and a despicable opportunity to the faith, hope and love to be gained in Heaven. Floor speeches were passionate and diverse. The Philodemic was graced with a succession of three Chancellors: Rugg, Haag and Drew, who elegantly squabbled over the choice between environment and individual position. Miss Green relied on her extensive knowledge of the Iliad to substantiate her assertion that the dignity of mankind simply does not lie in Hell. Memorably, Mr. Iacono capped off the evening with a characterization of Henle as the university’s own little Hell.

After all was said and done, the society negated the resolution with 22 votes compared to 12 affirming.



The following Merrick points were awarded:

1: Cantirino, Henderson

2: Walker

3: Drew

4: Olmsted

5: Hale

FINAL MERRICK POINT TOTALS

2: Henderson

3: Grace, Desnick

4: McElroy, Kwami

5: Dulik, Green, Downes, Tosetti

6: Olmsted

12: Harbour

16: Cantirino

17: Hale

19: Drew, Walker

21: Peterson

CONGRATULATIONS TO TYLER HALE, RANDY DREW, DUSTIN WALKER AND DREW PETERSON, OUR 2010 MERRICK KEYNOTE SPEAKERS!!

ELD,

SHD

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s